From: Nietzsche and the Post-Modern Condition (1991) Lecture 8: Nietzsche’s Progeny
Transcript: You know, how many novels begin with sentences describing the sky and the landscape. There are so many. It’s a standard novelistic beginning. Gibson begins his novel Neuromancer with the following sentence, and I consider it the best first sentence in 20th century American literature. I hate to use the word literature about this stuff. Neuromancer being a work of what I call “near future fictionâ€. A work that projects, as does the movie Blade Runner, the near future of possible social development based on very close analysis of current trends. In any case, the first sentence of the novel goes like this: “The sky above the port was the colour of television tuned to a dead channelâ€. Marvellous. Sets the tone for an incredible book. Short. Tough. Interesting. Brilliant.
That sentence frames for me a description of the postmodern trajectory… and to distance that sentence… and there is a massive distance… you could distance it from the sentences of Zarathustra, from The Gay Science. You could distance it from the first sentences of novels such as… “Call me Ishmael  Moby Dick. That’s a pretty well known first sentence in a novel. “Call me Ishmaelâ€. Referring all the way backward to a biblical text, and all the way forward to a new adventure. A new American adventure. In living a life that would allow for difference and community, it would allow for freedom, and the recognition of necessity. That project ends, in my view… or at least the dawning of the end, in Gibson. In that wonderful first sentence. “The sky above the port was the colour of television tuned to a dead channelâ€.
The fights that remain… the living antagonisms and our possibilities to construct ourselves in anything like free and autonomous ways will have to be fought across that barren, strange landscape… that unthinkable cultural future of deferred and indifferent pseudo experience. And across that terrain, the struggles for even moments of authentic lived experience… “authentic†in quotes – who knows… of lived experience… to feel something for god’s sakes… anything… will be the locus of struggle one would hope.
Here I will call to your mind a scene from Blade Runner, where before the replicant dies (Roy Batty), he slams his hand on a nail (and many of you may not know this), but when Batty does that in the film, it’s a reference to an action that Sartre has a character perform in “Roads to Freedomâ€. In “Roads to Freedomâ€, the Sartre character slams his hand onto a nail to prove that he is free. Because he chose to do it. It hurt like hell, but he chose it. I put my hand on that nail, and that shows I am free, because just as a calculus of deterministic pleasure I would never have done it. It’s a philosophical demonstration… a painful and stupid one in my opinion… but by the time we get to Blade Runner, the replicant slams his hand onto a nail just to feel anything. Just to feel anything. So don’t worry about the communists or the capitalists. Fight to live and feel anything. Thankyou I have enjoyed it very much. Thankyou.
« new festivals, new games, new myths marcuse’s self help program »
…and suddenly the TV was mounted on my wall. It looked amazing. So, I got a bigger one. I kept upgrading until an entire wall in my house was the screen–a high definition portrait of reality TV. Then I got another wall screen and another, then the floor and ceiling. I owned a ROOM TV! Everyone did. I sat in the the screen room, for hours, alone, as movies happened all around me.
I am so torn by that image. I want it, but I don’t want to want it, ya know?
Hurting yourself doesn’t prove you’re free any more than running a red light in heavy traffic or walking on the highway with your back to cars. I’m only talking about contra-causal free will. All other ideas of freedom means nothing, if you could not have done differently with same initial conditions.
For freedom to exist you must be able to rule out causality and randomness / chance. By causality I’m thinking of Nisargadatta Maharaj’s idea – that “nothing can happen unless the whole universe makes it happen.” It’s not a matter of A causes B ever. Everything in the universe, all forces interact and combine to create reality. Saying we are free can not be proven unless you can set up a loop in spacetime where you forget everything and live a certain moment repeatedly. Like “Groundhog Day” except nobody knows time is repeating. You also need someone to witness what happens without influencing it. Only God could do that. Really free will is a metaphysical idea not a scientific one. It’s impossible to test with any experiment in reality.
Thanks Bruce for your thoughtful comments. I have never personally held a strong position on this point other than the ones fed to me by cursory study of quantum mechanics (multiverse theory). I do think its important to find a way to make your choices matter though. At the very least strive to be the best version of yourself possible (healthy, compassionate)
To all Rick Roderick “fans” around the world “Hi”Some beg to differ, some beg for food, Some beg for anything that isnt contaminated I would like to beg to aggree-